AI 玩新聞
AI 玩新聞結合最新人工智慧技術，為您重新定義閱讀體驗。
我們利用 AI 快速摘要、分析觀點並趣味解讀全球時事，讓看新聞不再枯燥，輕鬆掌握世界脈動。立即探索資訊的未來型態！
n8n vs Make.com is the most important automation comparison of 2026. Both tools crush Zapier on price — but they serve completely different users. This guide breaks down all 25 dimensions so you can make the right choice the first time.
[su_box title=”Quick Verdict: n8n vs Make.com 2026″ box_color=”#1A1A2E” radius=”8″]
| n8n | Make.com | |
|---|---|---|
| 🏆 Best For | Developers, AI builders, data privacy | Marketers, SMBs, non-technical teams |
| 💰 Free Option | Self-hosted (completely free) | 1,000 ops/month cloud plan |
| 💵 Entry Price | €24/month (cloud) | ~$10.59/month |
| 🔗 Integrations | 1,800+ | 3,000+ |
| 🤖 AI Agents | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Best in class | ⭐⭐⭐ Solid |
| 🔓 Open Source | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| ⭐ G2 Rating | 4.8/5 | 4.7/5 |
TL;DR: Choose n8n if you’re a developer or want the best AI Agent capabilities. Choose Make.com if you want visual, non-technical automation at a fraction of Zapier’s cost.
[/su_box]
What Is n8n?
n8n (pronounced “nodemation”) is an open-source workflow automation platform founded in 2019 by Jan Oberhauser in Berlin. In 2024-2025, it raised $180M in Series B funding with participation from Accel and Nvidia, reaching a $2.5B valuation — making it one of the fastest-growing infrastructure companies in the AI era.
With 100,000+ GitHub Stars, 400,000+ active users, and a massive open-source community, n8n has become the de facto choice for developers who want to build serious automation systems — especially those involving AI Agents, LangChain, and MCP (Model Context Protocol).
n8n’s core promise: Full-power workflow automation that you can self-host for free — with a node-based editor that developers love and AI capabilities that rival enterprise tools costing 100× more.
What Is Make.com?
Make.com (formerly Integromat, founded 2012) is a visual workflow automation platform owned by Celonis, a process mining company valued at $13B+. Make serves 500,000+ active users with a drag-and-drop Canvas interface that lets non-technical users build complex automations — at prices that make Zapier look absurd.
In 2025, Make held its Waves ’25 conference announcing 16 major updates including Make AI Agents (now GA), the Maia natural language builder (Early Access), and the Make Grid management dashboard. The platform now offers 3,000+ app integrations across all plan tiers.
n8n vs Make.com Pricing: Which Is Actually Cheaper?
n8n Pricing (2026)
[su_table]
| Plan | Price | Executions/Month | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community (Self-Hosted) | Free | Unlimited | Open source, unlimited workflows, unlimited users, all features |
| Starter (Cloud) | €24/month | 2,500 executions | Unlimited workflows, advanced features |
| Pro (Cloud) | €60/month | 10,000 executions | Version history, workflow sharing, advanced debugging |
| Business (Cloud) | €800/month | 50,000 executions | SSO, SAML, compliance tools, SLA guarantees |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | On-premise deployment, full enterprise compliance |
[/su_table]
💡 n8n’s billing advantage: A workflow with 20 steps counts as 1 execution. So complex workflows don’t explode your usage.
Make.com Pricing (2026)
[su_table]
| Plan | Price (Monthly) | Operations/Month | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 ops | AI Agents, 3,000+ integrations, 2 active scenarios |
| Core | ~$10.59/mo | 10,000 ops | Unlimited scenarios, Webhooks, Make API |
| Pro | ~$18.82/mo | 10,000 ops | Priority execution, custom variables |
| Teams | ~$34.12/mo | 10,000 ops | Team roles, shared templates |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | SSO, SCIM, audit logs, 24/7 support |
[/su_table]
⚠️ Make.com’s billing: Each module (step) consumes 1 operation. A 20-step workflow running once = 20 ops consumed.
Side-by-Side Cost Comparison
[su_table]
| Scenario | n8n | Make.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free self-hosted use | ✅ Completely free (need $5-15/mo VPS) | ❌ 1,000 ops/month only | 🏆 n8n |
| Entry cloud plan | €24/mo (2,500 executions) | $10.59/mo (10,000 ops) | 🏆 Make.com |
| Complex workflows (20+ steps) | €24/mo (each run = 1 execution) | $10.59/mo (each run = 20 ops) | 🏆 n8n |
| Simple high-frequency automations | €24/mo | $10.59/mo | 🏆 Make.com |
| Developer/tech team (self-host) | Free (+ VPS cost) | Not available | 🏆 n8n (no contest) |
[/su_table]
Features Compared: n8n vs Make.com
[su_table]
| Feature | n8n | Make.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | 1,800+ | 3,000+ | 🏆 Make |
| Visual Interface | Node-based (technical) | Canvas (visual) | 🏆 Make (for non-devs) |
| Webhook Support | ✅ All plans | ⚠️ Paid plans only | 🏆 n8n |
| Scheduling (minimum) | ✅ Seconds | ⚠️ 1 min (paid) | 🏆 n8n |
| Code Execution | ✅ JS + Python nodes | ⚠️ Limited JS | 🏆 n8n |
| Data Transformation | ✅ Full JS/Python power | ⚠️ Basic | 🏆 n8n |
| Built-in Database | ❌ | ✅ Data Store | 🏆 Make |
| Auto-management Dashboard | ❌ | ✅ Make Grid | 🏆 Make |
| Open Source / Self-host | ✅ Fully open | ❌ Cloud only | 🏆 n8n |
| Data Privacy | ✅ Self-hosted control | ❌ Cloud storage | 🏆 n8n |
| Error Handling | ✅ Try/Catch + retry | ✅ Visual tracking | Tie |
| Sub-workflows | ✅ | ✅ | Tie |
[/su_table]
AI Agent Capabilities: n8n vs Make.com
n8n AI Agents: Best in Class (2026)
n8n has built arguably the most complete AI Agent ecosystem among no-code/low-code platforms. Key capabilities:
- Native LangChain Integration: Build LangChain-powered agents directly in n8n — GPT-4, Claude 3.5, Gemini, Llama, and more
- Human-in-the-Loop (HITL): Launched January 2026 — agents can pause and wait for human approval before executing sensitive actions
- MCP Client: Connect any MCP Server (browser automation, web search, databases) to your n8n agents
- MCP Server: Expose your n8n workflows AS an MCP server — so Claude, GPT, or any AI can call your automations directly
- RAG Pipeline: Built-in vector stores and document loaders for retrieval-augmented generation
- Memory Management: Cross-execution conversation memory — agents remember context across sessions
- 100,000+ GitHub Stars means a massive community of AI automation templates and examples
Make.com AI Agents: Accessible & Growing
- Make AI Agents (GA): Build and monitor AI agents within the visual Canvas — no code required
- Maia AI Builder (Early Access): Describe your workflow in natural language; Maia builds it automatically
- 350+ AI Integrations: OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Stability AI, and more
- Multi-modal Processing: AI agents can handle PDFs, images, and CSV files
- Bring Your Own API Key: Connect your own LLM API on all paid plans (since Nov 2025)
Verdict on AI: n8n wins on technical depth — LangChain, MCP, HITL, RAG — making it the choice for building production AI systems. Make.com wins on accessibility — visual AI agent creation without any AI engineering knowledge required.
Ease of Use: n8n vs Make.com
For Non-Technical Users
Make.com is easier. The visual Canvas is genuinely intuitive — you can see data flowing between modules in real-time. Maia (Early Access) lets you describe automations in plain English. Even with its learning curve (expect 10–20 hours to master), Make.com is significantly more accessible than n8n for people without coding backgrounds.
For Developers
n8n feels like home. The node-based editor is familiar to developers. You can write actual JavaScript and Python in execution nodes. The self-hosting option means you control everything. The 100,000+ GitHub Stars translate directly into community templates, integrations, and Stack Overflow-style help.
Who Should Use n8n vs Make.com?
[su_table]
| You Should Choose… | If You Are… | Because… |
|---|---|---|
| 🟦 n8n | Software developer / DevOps engineer | Open source, JS/Python nodes, GitHub integration |
| 🟦 n8n | Company with strict data privacy needs | Self-hosted = your data never leaves your servers |
| 🟦 n8n | AI Agent builder / AI developer | LangChain + MCP + HITL = best AI workflow toolchain |
| 🟦 n8n | Running complex workflows (20+ steps, high frequency) | Per-execution billing doesn’t penalize complexity |
| 🟦 n8n | Bootstrap team with technical skills | Self-hosted on $10/mo VPS = effectively free forever |
| 🟧 Make.com | Marketer / growth hacker | Visual Canvas is intuitive, no technical background needed |
| 🟧 Make.com | Small business owner (non-technical) | Zapier power at 1/10th the price, easier than n8n |
| 🟧 Make.com | E-commerce operator | Deep Shopify, WooCommerce, Stripe integrations |
| 🟧 Make.com | Team that wants 3,000+ integrations immediately | Broadest coverage, all available on every plan |
| 🟧 Make.com | Non-technical AI automation builder | Maia AI Builder removes the coding requirement |
[/su_table]
n8n vs Make.com vs Zapier: The Full Picture
[su_table]
| Feature | n8n | Make.com | Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Self-hosted (free) | 1,000 ops/mo | 100 tasks/mo |
| Entry Paid | €24/mo | ~$10.59/mo | $103.50/mo |
| Integrations | 1,800+ | 3,000+ | 8,000+ |
| AI Agents | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Self-hosting | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Best For | Developers, AI | SMBs, marketers | Beginners, max apps |
[/su_table]
Key takeaway: both n8n and Make.com beat Zapier on price by 60-90%. The n8n vs Make.com choice is about your technical level and use case, not about cost.
User Reviews: What Real Users Say
[su_table]
| Platform | n8n Rating | Make.com Rating |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | ⭐ 4.8/5 | ⭐ 4.7/5 |
| Capterra | N/A | ⭐ 4.8/5 |
| Product Hunt | ⭐ 4.7/5 | N/A |
[/su_table]
n8n users love the open-source freedom and AI capabilities. Make.com users rave about the visual interface and cost savings vs Zapier. Both communities are active and growing rapidly.
Final Verdict: n8n vs Make.com in 2026
[su_box title=”Final Recommendation” box_color=”#16213E” radius=”8″]
✅ Choose n8n if: You’re a developer, want open-source self-hosting, need the best AI Agent capabilities (LangChain + MCP + HITL), or have strict data privacy requirements.
✅ Choose Make.com if: You’re non-technical, want the best Zapier alternative with a visual interface, need 3,000+ integrations without coding, or are looking for the best cost-performance balance on cloud automation.
⚠️ Consider Zapier if: You need 8,000+ integrations, want the simplest possible setup, or need enterprise-level AI Copilot features.
[/su_box]
[su_button url=”[n8n 聯盟連結待插入]” target=”blank” style=”flat” background=”#1A1A2E” size=”6″ wide=”yes” center=”yes” radius=”5″ icon=”icon: code”]Try n8n Free (Self-Hosted)[/su_button]
[su_button url=”[Make.com 聯盟連結待插入]” target=”blank” style=”flat” background=”#0060FF” size=”6″ wide=”yes” center=”yes” radius=”5″ icon=”icon: arrow-right”]Try Make.com Free[/su_button]
Frequently Asked Questions
Is n8n better than Make.com?
It depends on your use case. n8n is better for developers, AI Agent builders, and anyone needing self-hosting with full data control. Make.com is better for non-technical users, marketers, and teams migrating from Zapier who want a visual, affordable alternative.
Is n8n free compared to Make.com?
n8n’s self-hosted (Community) version is completely free — you only pay for a VPS server ($5-15/month). Make.com’s free plan gives 1,000 operations/month on its cloud service. For cloud-to-cloud comparison, Make.com ($10.59/mo) is cheaper than n8n’s entry cloud plan (€24/mo).
Can I switch from Make.com to n8n?
Yes, but it requires rebuilding your workflows. There’s no direct migration tool between the two platforms. If you’re considering switching, the main reasons are: wanting open-source self-hosting, needing advanced AI Agent capabilities, or reducing costs through self-hosting.
Which has better AI automation — n8n or Make.com?
n8n leads on AI Agent depth — with native LangChain integration, MCP Client/Server support, Human-in-the-Loop capabilities, and RAG pipelines. Make.com is catching up with AI Agents (GA) and the Maia natural language builder, but the technical depth of n8n’s AI ecosystem is still unmatched in 2026.
Is n8n or Make.com easier to use?
Make.com is significantly easier for non-technical users — the visual Canvas is intuitive and Maia lets you build with natural language. n8n is more familiar and powerful for developers, but has a steeper learning curve for beginners.
Does n8n have more integrations than Make.com?
No. Make.com has 3,000+ integrations vs n8n’s 1,800+ (including community integrations). However, n8n’s HTTP node allows connecting to any service with an API, partially closing this gap for technical users.
